Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh

Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh
Founders Dr K B Hedgewar
Type Volunteer organisation
Founded 1925
Location India
Members estimated at 2.5 to 6 million [1]
Website http://www.rss.org/

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) (Hindi: राष्ट्रीय स्वयंसेवक संघ), (National Volunteer Organization[2] or National Patriotism Organization[3]), also known the Sangh, is a Hindu supremacist[4] paramilitary[5] volunteer[6] organization in India. It is part of the Hindu nationalist Sangh Parivar.[5] It was founded in 1925 by Dr. K. B. Hedgewar, a doctor from Nagpur, as a social and cultural organisation in British India,[6] to oppose both British colonialism in India and Muslim separatism.[4]

RSS volunteers participated in various political and social movements including the freedom movement[6] and the organization became the leading Hindu nationalist organization in India.[4] By the 1990s, the group had established numerous schools, charities and clubs to propagate its ideology.[4] RSS volunteers are also known for their role in the relief and rehabilitation work during natural calamities[7] and for running more than 100,000 service programs in education, health care, rural development, tribal emancipation, village self-sufficiency, and the rehabilitation of lepers and special needs children.[8][9]

Some critics have referred to the RSS as a Hindu nationalist organization.[1][10][11][12] Some others call it a Hindu supremacist[4] and paramilitary[5] organization. Other critics have accused it of supporting militancy.[13] The RSS denies these accusations, and has sued some accusers.[14] The RSS has been banned three times by the Government of India. It was banned first by the British, then again after independence in 1948 when a former member[15] assassinated Mahatma Gandhi.[4]

Contents

History

Dr. Keshav Baliram Hedgewar founder of RSS

RSS was founded in 1925 by Dr. Keshav Baliram Hedgewar, who was a doctor in the central Indian city of Nagpur[16]. Hedgewar as a medical student in Kolkata had been a part of the revolutionary activities of the Anushilan Samiti and Jugantar striving to free India from British rule[17][18]. He had been charged with sedition in 1921 by the British Administration and was imprisoned for a year[18]. After returning to Nagpur, he was briefly a member of Indian National Congress[17] before he left it in 1925, to form the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. After the formation of the RSS, Hedgewar kept the organization from having any direct affiliation with any of the political organisations then fighting British rule.[10] But Hedgewar and teams of volunteers, took part in the Indian National Congress, led movements against the British rule. Hedgewar was arrested in the Jungle Satyagraha agitation in 1931 and served a second term in prison.[17][18][19]

The RSS was established as a educational body whose objective was to train a group of Hindus, who on the basis of their character would work to unite the Hindu community so that India could become an independent country and a creative society[6]. Encyclopedia Britannica opines that "Hedgewar was heavily influenced by the writings of the Hindu nationalist ideologue Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and adopted much of his rhetoric concerning the need for the creation of a 'Hindu nation'. Contradicting its own statement Britannica also claims that RSS is established to foster unity among Hindu youths of all castes and classes"[20] Hedgewar formed the RSS as a disciplined cadre consisting mostly of upper-caste Brahmins who were dedicated to independence and the protection of Hindu political, cultural, and religious interests. The RSS' tradition of uniforms and mass demonstrations was modeled after the Italian Fascist Party[4] Additionally, during WWII the RSS' members openly admired Adolf Hitler.[4] Golwalkar, who became the supreme leader of the RSS after Hedgewar, drew inspiration from Adolf Hitler's ideology of racial purity.[21]

To keep up the purity of the Race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the country of the Semitic races—the Jews. Race pride at its highest has been manifested here. Germany has also shown how well nigh impossible it is for Races and cultures, having differences going to the root, to be assimilated into one united whole, a good lesson for us in Hindustan to learn and profit by.

Madhavrao Golwalkar, We, or Our Nation Defined, Nagpur: Bharat publications, 1939, p. 37. [22]

Activities during partition

A rare photograph taken at the RSS meeting in 1939. By that time RSS had already gained an all India presence

The Partition of India was a very traumatic event in the young nation's history with millions of Sikhs, Hindus and Muslims, attempting to escape the violence and carnage that followed.[23].

Noted Gandhian and recipient of the highest civilian award in India, Bharat Ratna, Dr. Bhagwan Das commended the role of the "high-spirited and self-sacrificing boys" of the RSS in protecting the newly formed Republic of India, from a planned coup to topple the Jawaharlal Nehru Administration in Delhi[24][25]

RSS was involved in major attacks on minority groups [26]. in which 1,000 individuals were killed in the incident at Garmukteswar on November 1946[27]. These types of major attacks and counterattacks by Muslim and Sikh organizations and RSS cemented the public perception regarding Muhammad Ali Jinnah's Two-Nation theory.[26]

Gandhi's assassination, the ban and the acquittal

Following Mahatma Gandhi's assassination in 1948 by a member[4] or former member[15] of the RSS, Nathuram Godse, many prominent leaders of the RSS were arrested and RSS as an organization was banned on February 4, 1948. The RSS is considered responsible for the murder of Mahatma Gandhi [28][4][29] despite having been acquitted of all charges by the Supreme Court of India.[16] The assassination has been seen as an act of terrorism by the RSS to caution Indian citizens away from Gandhi's secular policies.[28] Godse's connection with the RSS was investigated.[30] Justice Kapur Commission[30] setup to look into the conspiracy to murder Mahatma Gandhi noted the following

"...RSS as such were not responsible for the murder of Mahatma Gandhi, meaning thereby that one could not name the organization as such as being responsible for that most diabolical crime, the murder of the apostle of peace". "It has not been proved that they (the accused) were members of the RSS which shows that they (the accused) were believers in a more violent form of activities..."

Kapur Commission Report, Vol. 1, Page 165

“As a final result of the poison, the country had to suffer the sacrifice of the invaluable life of Gandhiji. Even an iota of the sympathy of the Government or of the people no more remained for the RSS. In fact, opposition grew. Opposition turned more severe when the RSS men expressed joy and distributed sweets after Gandhiji's death.”

Sardar Patel – freedom fighter, first Home Minister and Deputy Prime Minister of India [31][32]

Sardar Patel also pointed out that members of RSS have indulged in attacking "innocent and helpless men, women and children"[31].

RSS Leaders were acquitted of the conspiracy charge by the Supreme Court of India and following an intervention by the Court, the Indian Government agreed to lift the ban with condition that the RSS adopt a formal constitution. The second Sarsanghachalak, Golwalkar drafted the constitution for the RSS which he sent to the government in March 1949. In July of the same year, after many negotiations over the constitution and its acceptance, the ban on RSS was lifted.[16]

On January 15, 2000, a daily, The Statesman, carried a story about the RSS by A G Noorani, which depicted the RSS as the killer of Gandhi[33]. Subsequently the Delhi unit of the RSS filed a criminal case of defamation against author of the article A G Noorani along with the cartoonist and the Managing Director of the publishing house. When two of the accused did not respond to the Court summons, non-bailable warrants were issued in their name by the Court[14]. On February 25, 2002, Noorani wrote an unconditional apology to the court in which he regretted writing the defamatory article against the RSS. On March 3, 2002, 'The Statesman' also published an apology regretting the publication of the said article.[34]

Liberation of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Goa

After the Independence of India, many organizations including the RSS aspired to liberate Dadra and Nagar Haveli from Portuguese occupation. In early 1954, volunteers Raja Wakankar and Nana Kajrekar of the RSS visited the area round about Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman several times to study the topography and also to get acquainted with the local workers who were agitating for the liberation. In April 1954, the RSS formed a coalition with the National Movement Liberation Organization (NMLO), the and Azad Gomantak Dal (AGD) for the liberation of Dadra and Nagar Haveli[35]. On the night of 21 July, United front of Goans, a group, working independently of the coalition, captured the Portuguese police station at Dadra and declared Dadra as free. Subsequently on 28 July, volunteer teams of the RSS and AGD captured the territories of Naroli and Phiparia and ultimately the capital of Silvassa. The Portuguese forces which escaped and moved towards Nagar Haveli, were assaulted at Khandvel and were forced to retreat till they surrendered to the Indian border police at Udava on 11 August 1954. A native administration was setup with Appasaheb Karmalkar of NMLO as the Administrator of Dadra and Nagar Haveli on 11 August 1954[36].

The liberation of Dadra and Nagar Haveli gave a boost to the freedom movement against the Portuguese in Goa[36]. In 1955, RSS leaders demanded the end of Portuguese rule in Goa and its integration into India. When Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru refused to obtain it by armed intervention, RSS leader Jagannath Rao Joshi led the satyagraha agitation straight into Goa itself. He was imprisoned with his followers by the Portuguese police. The peaceful protests continued but met with severe repressions. On 15 August 1955, the Portuguese police opened fire on the satyagrahis, killing thirty or so people[37].

Role during the 1962 Sino-Indian War

The RSS which had been keeping low profile after the lifting of the ban, earned recognition based on its volunteer work during the Sino-Indian War in 1962[38]. RSS was invited by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru to take part in the Indian Republic day parade of 1963[39]. It along with several other civilian organizations took part in the parade[40]. This event helped the RSS increase its popularity and its patriotic image.[41][42][43]

Later in 1965 and 1971 Indo-Pak wars too, the RSS volunteers offered their services to maintain law and order of the country and were apparently the first to donate blood.[44]

Movement for the restoration of democracy

In 1975, the Indian Government under the Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi, proclaimed emergency rule in India, thereby suspending the fundamental rights and curtailing the rights of the press.[45] This extreme step was taken after the Supreme Court of India, cancelled her election to the Indian Parliament on charges of malpractices in the election[45]. The democratic institutions were kept under suspended animation and prominent opposition leaders including Gandhian Jayaprakash Narayan, were arrested and thousands of people were detained without any charges being framed against them.[46] RSS, which was seen close to opposition leaders, and with its large organizational base was seen to have potential of organizing protests against the Government, was also banned.[47] Police clamped down on the organization and thousands of its workers were imprisoned.[17]

The RSS defied the ban and thousands participated in Satyagraha (peaceful protests) against the ban and against the curtailment of fundamental rights. Later, when there was no letup, the volunteers of the RSS formed underground movements for the restoration of democracy. Literature that was censored in the media was clandestinely published and distributed on a large scale and funds were collected for the movement. Networks were established between leaders of different political parties in the jail and outside for the coordination of the movement[48]. 'The Economist', London, described the movement as "the only non-left revolutionary force in the world". It said that the movement was "dominated by tens of thousands of RSS cadres, though more and more young recruits are coming". Talking about its objectives it said "its platform at the moment has only one plank: to bring democracy back to India"[49]. The Emergency was lifted in 1977 and as a consequence the ban on the RSS too was lifted.

Participation in land reforms

It has been noted that the RSS volunteers participated in the Bhoodan movement organized by Gandhian leader Vinobha Bhave. Vinobha Bhave had met the RSS leader M. S. Golwalkar in Meerut in November 1951. Golwalkar had been inspired by the movement that encouraged land reforms through voluntary means. He pledged the support of the RSS for this movement[50]. Consequently, many RSS volunteers led by Nanaji Deshmukh participated in the movement.[6]. But Golwalkar has also been critical of the Bhoodan movement, on other occasions for being reactionary and for working "merely with a view to counteracting Communism". He believed that the movement should inculcate a right and positive faith in the masses that can make them rise above the base appeal of Communism[51].

Organization

Although the RSS claims not to keep membership records, it is estimated that the organization has between 2.5–6 million members.[1]

Sarsanghchalaks

The Sarsanghchalak (Sanskrit: राष्ट्रीय स्वयंसेवक संघ) is the head of the RSS organization. The individuals who have been Sarsanghchalaks are:

The position is decided by nomination by predecessor. The current Sarsanghachalak of RSS is Dr. Mohan Madhukar Bhagwat.

Shakha

"Shakha" is Hindi for "branch". Most of the organizational work of the RSS is done through the coordination of shakhas or branches. These shakhas are run for 1 hour in public places. In 2004, more than 60,000 shakhas were run throughout India.[52]. However the number of Shakas has fallen by over 10,000 since the fall of the BJP led government in 2004.[53] According to Vagish Issar, RSS's media representative in Delhi, the number of Shakas has fallen to 39,823 as of January 2010.[53] Local leaders have asserted links to the casteist policies of the Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party have driven members away.[53]

The shakhas conduct various activities for its volunteers which include physical fitness activities through yoga, exercises and games. It has other activities which emphasize on qualities like civic sense, social service, community living and patriotism.[54] The volunteers are trained in first aid and in rescue and rehabilitation operations. The volunteers are also encouraged to get involved in the developmental activities of the village or locality[54][55].

IT Milan

For swayamsevaks who work in IT(Information Technology) related sectors another form of Shakha is set, called as "IT Milan". These are weekly meetings unlike the regular Shakhas which run daily. IT Milans are observed in many IT cities in India – Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Pune. There are as many as 3,000 techies in Bangalore who meet regularly this way. This 60–90 minutes weekly gathering includes a Prayer, Surya Namaskara, Yoga, games, song and sermon. IT Milans are user friendly; the prayer is available as a printout, usually everyone is addressed in English, and there are enough people to aid newcomers on the Surya Namaskara and seven yoga asanas. These exercises have been designed for IT professionals who suffer from chronic lower backache due to long hours at computers. It also helps that their employers respect their RSS links. Games are played during the Milan to relieve tension in the minds of IT Swayamsevaks and foster team spirit. An IT Milan also serves as a forum for discussion on various issues of national and international importance like the Copenhagen Summit and West Bengal government's decision to grant religion based reservation to Muslims.[56]

Mission

The mission of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has been described as the revitalization of Indian value system based on universalism and peace and prosperity to all[51]. Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, the worldview that the whole world is one family, propounded by the ancient thinkers of India, is considered as the ultimate mission of the organization[57].

But the immediate focus, the leaders believe, is on the Hindu renaissance, which would build an egalitarian society and a strong India that could propound this philosophy. Hence, the focus is on social reform, economic upliftment of the downtrodden and the protection of cultural diversity of the natives in India.[57] The organization says, it aspires to unite all Hindus and build a strong India, which could contribute to the welfare of the world. In the words of RSS ideologue and the second head of the RSS, M S Golwalkar, "in order to be able to contribute our unique knowledge to mankind, in order to be able to live and strive for the unity and welfare of the world, we stand before the world as a self-confident, resurgent and mighty nation".[51]

In Vichardhara (English: "Bunch of Thoughts"), M S Golwalkar, affirms the RSS mission of integration as:[51]

"Realising the national character of Hindu People, the RSS has been making determined efforts to inculcate in them burning devotion for Bharat and its national ethos; kindle in them the spirit of dedication and sterling qualities and character; rouse social consciousness, mutual good-will, love and cooperation among them all; to make them realise that casts, creeds and languages are secondary and that service to the nation is the supreme end and to mold their behaviour accordingly; instill in them a sense of true humility and discipline and train their bodies to be strong and robust so as to shoulder any social responsibility; and thus to create all-round Anushasana in all walks of life and build together all our people into a unified harmonious national whole, extending from Himalayas to Kanyakumari."

M S Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts

Golwalkar also explains that RSS does not intend to compete in electioneering politics or share power. He asserts that there is no place in RSS for any hatred or opposition towards any particular caste, creed or party.

Christopher Jaffrelot opines that RSS's objective has been the establishment of a Hindu nation in India and that its two-fold objective was to propagate the Hindutva ideology and infuse physical strength to the Hindu community[58].

Sangh Parivar

Organizations which are inspired by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh's ideology refer themselves as the members of the Sangh Parivar.[1] In most of the cases, pracharaks (full-time volunteers of the RSS) were deputed to start and manage these organizations. The organizations within the Sangh include the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Rashtriya Sevika Samiti, Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, Vanavasi Kalyan Ashram, Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Vidya Bharati, Seva Bharati and many others spread in all parts of society.[59] Numerous other Hindutva organizations take inspiration from the RSS's philosophy.

RSS has never directly contested elections, but supports parties that are ideologically similar. Although RSS generally endorses the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), yet at times had refused to do so due to difference of opinion with the party. Also, RSS is open to support any political party that subscribes to its views.[60][61].

Of late, the volunteers of the RSS have also held prominent political and administrative positions in India including the Prime Minister of India, the Vice President of India, the Home Minister and Ministers in the Central Government, Governors and Chief Ministers of various states and the members of elected bodies at the state and the national level and also the Indian ambassador to the US[62][63][64]

Social reform

The RSS has advocated the training of Dalits and other backward classes as temple high priests (a position traditionally reserved for Caste Brahmins and denied to lower castes). They argue that the social divisiveness of the Caste system is responsible for the lack of adherence to Hindu values and traditions and reaching out to the lower castes in this manner will be a remedy to the problem[65]. The RSS has also condemned 'upper' caste Hindus for preventing Dalits from worshipping at temples, saying that "even God will desert the temple in which Dalits cannot enter"[66]

Christophe Jaffrelot finds that "there is insuficient data available to carry out a statistical analysis of social origins of the early RSS leaders" but goes on to conclude, based on some known profiles that most of the RSS founders and its leading organisers, with exceptions were Maharashtrian Brahmins from middle or lower class[67] and argues that the pervasiveness of the Brahminical ethic in the organisation was probably the main reason why it failed to attract support from the low castes. He argues that the "RSS resorted to instrumentalist techniques of ethno-religious mobilisation – in which its Brahminism was diluted – to overcome this handicap."[68] However Anderson and Damle 1987, find that members of all castes have been welcomed into the organisation and are treated as equals[6].

During M. K. Gandhi's visit to RSS Camp accompanied by Mahadev Desai and Mirabehn at Wardha in 1934, he was surprised by the discipline and the absence of untouchability in RSS and commented "When i visited the RSS Camp. I was very much surprised by your discipline and absence of untouchablity ". He personally inquired to Swayamsevaks and found that they were living and eating together in the camp without bothering to know their castes.[69]

Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar while visiting the RSS camp at Pune in 1939 observed that Swayamsevaks were moving in absolute equality and brotherhood without even caring to know the cast of others.[70] In his address to the Swayamsevaks, he said that " This is the first time that I am visiting the camp of Sangh volunters. I am happy to find absolute equality between Savarniyas (Upper cast) and Harijans (Lower cast) without any one being aware of such difference existing." When he asked Dr Hedgewar whether there were any untouchables in the camp, he replied that there are neither "touchables" nor "untouchables" but only Hindus[71].

Relief and rehabilitation

Natural calamities

RSS has participated in many relief activities during natural calamities. For instance, in the 2001 Gujarat earthquake, Indian newsmagazine Outlook's reporter Saba Naqvi Bhaumik reported that:

"Literally within minutes RSS volunteers were at the scenes of distress. Across Gujarat, the (RSS) cadres were the saviors. Even as the state machinery went comatose in the first two days after the quake, the cadre-based machinery of the Sangh fanned out throughout the state. Approximately 35,000 RSS members in uniform were pressed into service."

Saba Naqvi Bhaumik, Outlook, Feb 12, 2001

"This is an old tradition in the RSS. To be the first at any disaster strike: floods, cyclone, drought and now quake. In Kutch, too, the RSS was the first to reach the affected areas. At Anjar, a town in ruins, the RSS was present much before the Army took the lead in finding survivors and fishing out the dead."

K. Srinivas, District collector of Ahmedabad

India-Today, reported in its Feb. 12, 2001 issue that

"It is conceded by even their worst detractors that the RSS has been in the forefront of the non- official rescue and relief (operations). This has led to an upsurge of goodwill for the Sangh"

India Today

The RSS assisted in relief efforts quite extensively during the 2001 Gujarat earthquake. They helped rebuild villages.[72] They "earned kudos" from many varied agencies and sources for their actions.[73]

This is a long and continuous tradition with the RSS. The RSS was instrumental in relief efforts after the 1971 Orissa Cyclone and the 1977 Andhra Pradesh Cyclone.[73]

An RSS-affiliated NGO, Seva Bharati, has adopted 57 children (38 Muslims and 19 Hindus) from militancy affected areas of Jammu and Kashmir to provide them education at least up to Higher Secondary level[74][75]. They have also taken care of many victims of the Kargil War of 1999.[76]

Seva Bharati conducted relief operations in the aftermath of the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake. Activities included building shelters for the victims, providing food, clothes and medical necessities.[77]. The RSS assisted relief efforts during the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake and the subsequent tsunami.[78].

In 2006, RSS participated in relief efforts to provide basic necessities such as food, milk and potable water to the people of Surat, Gujarat who were affected by massive floods in the region[79].

The RSS volunteers carried out massive relief and rehabilitation work after the floods ravaged North Karnataka and some districts of the state of Andhra Pradesh.[80]

Protection of Sikhs during the 1984 anti-Sikh riots

Sikh intellectual and author of 'A History of the Sikhs', Khushwant Singh, credits members of the RSS with helping and protecting Sikhs who were being targeted by members of the Congress(I) political party during the 1984 Anti-Sikh Riots.[81] Singh who otherwise has been critical of the RSS and believes that it is a " communal organization and dangerous to the country's secular fabric"

"RSS has played an honorable role in maintaining Hindu-Sikh unity before and after the murder of Indira Gandhi in Delhi and in other places"
"It was the Congress (I) leaders who instigated mobs in 1984 and got more than 3000 people killed. I must give due credit to RSS and the BJP for showing courage and protecting helpless Sikhs during those difficult days. No less a person than Atal Bihari Vajpayee himself intervened at a couple of places to help poor taxi drivers.

[81]

Discrimination against RSS volunteers

Many cases have been reported in post-independence India where RSS volunteers have been discriminated against by the government due to their allegiance to the RSS and its ideology.[82] In a court case of a teacher who was dismissed from service due to his past links with the RSS, the Supreme Court labeled the government's action as "McCarthyism" and a "violation of fundamental rights".[83][84][85][86][87][88]

A municipal school teacher, Ramshanker Raghuvanshi, was dismissed by the Congress government of Madhya Pradesh in 1974, which stated that he had taken "part in the RSS" activities and hence was "not a fit person to be entertained in Government service". The Supreme Court dismissed the arguments of the government and said that the government had not adhered to the provisions of the Indian Constitution. The Supreme Court bench consisting of Justice Syed Murtuza Fazalali and Justice O. Chinnappa Reddy observed that "India is not a police state" and pleaded that the "promise of fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution not become a forgotten chapter of history". Delivering the landmark judgment, the Court observed that "seeking a police report on person's political faith", in the first place, "amounted to the violation of fundamental rights". The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the municipal teacher and ordered his reinstatement.[83][84][85][86][87][88]

Similar observations were made by the High courts of different provinces of India in different cases of political persecution of RSS volunteers.[82] One case involved Ranganathacharya Agnihotri, who was selected for the post of Munsiff but was not absorbed into service as he had been a volunteer of the RSS in his past. When Agnihotri approached the High Court of Mysore, he was reinstated. The Court observed:

"Prima facie the RSS is a non-political cultural organization without any hatred or ill will towards non-Hindus and that many eminent and respected persons in the country have not hesitated to preside over the functions or appreciate the work of its volunteers. In a country like ours which has accepted the democratic way of life (as ensured by the Constitution), it would not be within reason to accept the proposition that mere membership of such peaceful or non-violent association and participation in activities thereof, will render a person (in whose character and antecedents there are no other defects) unsuitable to be appointed to the post of a Munsiff."

High Court of Mysore, The State of Karnataka Vs Ranganathacharya Agnihotri, writ No. 588/1966

The RSS also has been banned in India thrice, during periods in which the government of the time claimed that they were a threat to the state: in 1948 after Mahatma Gandhi's assassination, during the Emergency (1975–77), and after the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition. The bans were subsequently lifted, in 1949 after the RSS was absolved of charges in the Gandhi murder case, in 1977 as a result of the Emergency being revoked, and in 1993 when no evidence of any unlawful activities was found against it by the tribunal constituted under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.[89]

Reception

Field Marshal Cariappa in his speech to RSS volunteers said "RSS is my heart's work. My dear young men, don't be disturbed by uncharitable comments of interested persons. Look ahead! Go ahead! The country is standing in need of your services" [90]

Dr Zakir Hussain the former President of India once told to Milad Mehfil in Monghyar on November 20, 1949 "The allegations against RSS of violence and hatred against Muslims are wholly false. Muslims should learn the lesson of mutual love, cooperation and organization from RSS.[91][92]

Noted Gandhian leader and the leader of Sarvoday movement, Jayaprakash Narayan, who earlier was a vocal opponent of RSS had the following to say about it in 1977 "RSS is a revolutionary organization. No other organization in the country comes anywhere near it. It alone has the capacity to transform society, end casteism and wipe the tears from the eyes of the poor." He further added "I have great expectations from this revolutionary organization which has taken up the challenge of creating a new India" [93]

Criticisms and accusations

The RSS on one hand has been accused of being a reactionary group of "Hindu fanatics" with "fascist tendencies; on the other hand has been seen as a cultural organisation dedicated to the revitalising of the moral and spiritual traditions of India"[16].Hindu biased[94][95] The New York Times and The Times UK call the RSS an extremist[96] and militant [97] Hindu organization. Other allegations have been that it is a "right-wing religious movement"[15] and that it is the core of a family of militant Hindu nationalist organizations.[98].

Christopher Jaffrelot, the director of the Center for Studies and Research (CERI) observes that although the RSS with its paramilitary style of functioning and its emphasis on discipline has sometimes been seen by some as "an Indian version of fascism."[99], he believes that the characteristic of the RSS's ideology has been to down-play the role of the state and hence it cannot be classified as a fascist movement. He further argues that RSS's ideology treats society as an organism with a secular spirit, which is implanted not so much in the race as in a socio-cultural system and which will be regenerated over the course of time by patient work at the grassroots. He writes that ideology of the RSS did not develop a theory of the state and the race, a crucial elements in European nationalisms; Nazism and Fascism"[99] and that the RSS leaders were interested in cultural unity rather than racial homogeneity[100].

The likening of Sangh Parivar to "fascism" by Western critics has been critiqued by Jyotirmaya Sharma as an "attempt by them to make sense" of the growth of extremist politics and intolerance within their society. And that such "simplistic transference" has done great injustice to our knowledge of Hindu nationalist politics.[101]. Belgian scholar Dr Koenraad Elst, points out that such accusations have come mainly from the Marxist academia in India and abroad and that they are less driven by facts than by their ideological zeal. He also criticises the Hindu organisations for being "piecemeal" in their replies to such "polemical" accusations[102].

Alleged involvement in Babri mosque disputed structure demolition

The Liberhan Commission report accused the Sangh Parivar of being the chief architect of Babari Masjid demolition [103][104]. The Commission observes, "The blame or the credit for the entire temple construction movement at Ayodhya must necessarily be attributed to the Sangh Parivar"[105]. It noted that the Sangh Parivar is an "extensive and widespread organic body", which encompasses organizations, which address and assimilate just about every type of social, professional and other demographic grouping of individuals. "Each time, a new demographic group has emerged, the Sangh Parivar has hived off some of its RSS inner-core leadership to harness that group and bring it within the fold, enhancing the voter base of the Parivar."[106]

The RSS has disputed the reliability and objectivity of the report. Former RSS chief K S Sudarshan said the mosque was demolished by the government men and not by the Karsevaks, and that the commission reports are fabricated and motivated primarily by anti-Indian sentiment than any objective desire to seek justice. Sudarshan claimed "the armed forces personnel present there caused the damage to its walls by triggering an explosive."[107]

“We all went there with a mission to demolish the masjid and succeeded”[108]

Madan Mohan Sarkar, an RSS activist who took part in Babri mosque demolition

On the other hand, the Government of India's white paper dismisses that demolition of the disputed structure was preplanned.[109]

Everything was normal, the karseva was proceeding ‘as per the plan’ of the organisers;
but ‘in a sudden development’ the karsevaks broke the police cordon and entered the
structure in large numbers and then the demolition took place.

The white paper released by the Government of India on the Ayodhya events[109]

Opposition leader Arun Jaitley, whose party's name was mentioned in the report[110] described the Liberhan Commission report as a ‘tragedy of errors’ and a ‘national joke’.[111]. Further, Asian Tribune's J N Raina calls the Liberhan Commission's report as 'absurd' and compares it to the fictional tale Alif Laila.[112]

Allegation of Involvement in Riots and Violence

The Human Rights Watch group has accused Vishwa Hindu Parishad (World Hindu Council, VHP), Bajrang Dal, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to have been directly involved in violence against Muslims which erupted after 56 Hindus were burnt alive in a coach of Sabarmati Express train at Godhra station. Local VHP, BJP and BD leaders have been named in many police reports filed by eyewitnesses.[113] Contrary to the accusations made by Human Rights Watch, RSS and VHP made appeals to put an end to the violence. They asked their volunteers, sympathizers and friends to prevent any activity that might disrupt peace.[114]

RSS along with its offshoot organizations Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), Bajrang Dal (BD) and Hindu Jagaran Sammukhya (HJS) stand accused of orchestrating the August 2008 anti-Christian riots in Orissa.[96][115] [116] A US-based Christian charity working in Orissa claimed that Hindu extremists were offering money, food and alcohol to mobs to kill Christians and destroy their homes. It also alleges that these extremists had put a price tag of $250 on the head of every pastor[96]. RSS denied these allegations calling them "absolutely false" and in turn blamed Congress for the pogrom.[96][117] The violence was triggered by the murder of a senior VHP member Swami Lakshamananda Saraswati [118]. VHP blamed Christians and called for revenge, even though Maoist militants claimed responsibility for the killing.[96] RSS/HJS blamed Mr. Radha Kanta Nayak, a member of Congress party of being responsible for the killing and accused his NGO, World Vision of being involved in religious conversions.[117]

The RSS has been censured for its involvement in communal riots in at least six reports by judges who presided over commissions of inquiry:

  1. Jaganmohan Reddy report on the Ahmedabad riots 1969
  2. D.P. Madon report on the Bhiwandi riots in 1970
  3. Vithayathil report on the Tellicherry riots in 1971
  4. Jitendra Narain report on the Jamshedpur riots in 1979
  5. P. Venugopal report on the Kanyakumari riots of 1982
  6. report on the Bhagalpur riots in 1989[119]

"After giving careful and serious consideration to all the materials that are on record,the Commission is of the view that the RSS with its extensive organisation in jamshedpur and which had close links with the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh had a positive hand in creating a climate which was most propitious for the outbreak of communal disturbances." "In the first instance, the speech of Shri Deoras (deliverd just five days before the Ram Navami festival) tended to encourage the Hindu extremists to be unyielding in their demands regarding Road No. 14. Secondly, his speech amounted to communal propaganda. Thirdly,the shakhas and the camps that were held during the divisional conference presented a militant atmosphere to the Hindu public. In the circumstances, the commission cannot but hold the RSS responsible for creating a climate for the disturbances that took place on the 11th of April, 1979"[120][121]

Jidendra Narayan commission inquired on 1979 Jamshadpur communal violence

I have no doubt that the RSS had taken an active part in rousing up anti-muslim feeling among the Hindus of Tellicherry and in preparing the background for the disturbances. The same can be said about the Jan Sang also. Although there may not be any official connection between the Jan Sang and The RSS, the RSS is generally regarded as the military wing of Jan Sang and the Jan Sang The political wing of RSS"[122][123]

Justice Vithayithil inquiry commission

Call for 'altering the Constitution completely'

In 2007, RSS chief said that the Constitution of India was “based on the Government of India Act of 1935, a tool of capitalist expansion of the British Raj”, and even went as far as calling it “the root cause of India’s ills”. The chief went on to say "We need not fight shy of altering the constitution completely, having already amended it a hundred times". To support his views, he quoted Mahatma Gandhi as saying that he didn't like the constitution as it was based on a relic of the British Raj and B.R. Ambedkar, the architect of the constitution, as saying that he would have burnt it if he had his way.

Senior advocate K.H. Deshpande criticized RSS saying “A unitary state that RSS wants is neither desirable nor feasible in the land of myriad diversities that is India”. A former chief justice of Bombay High Court denied that the constitution was a mere patchwork or that it did not reflect the Indian ethos. He said "It reflects the collective aspirations of the Indian freedom fighters".

As for B.R. Ambedkar's remarks, an eminent economist has pointed out that he was taken out of context and was referring to "illusive economic equality and freedom of opportunities 10 years after India won political freedom". [124] [125]

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Bhatt, Chetan (2001). Hindu Nationalism: Origins, Ideologies and Modern Myths. New York: Berg Publishers. p. 113. ISBN 1-85973-348-4. 
  2. "Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)". http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/919613/Rashtriya-Swayamsevak-Sangh. "(Hindi: “National Volunteer Organization”) also called Rashtriya Seva Sang" 
  3. Lutz, James M.; Lutz, Brenda J. (2008). Global Terrorism. Taylor & Francis. pp. 303. ISBN 9780415772464. http://books.google.com/books?id=VEPz1Dn0g6AC&pg=PA100. Retrieved 11 June 2010. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 Atkins, Stephen E. (2004). Encyclopedia of modern worldwide extremists and extremist groups. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 264–265. ISBN 9780313324857. http://books.google.com/books?id=b8k4rEPvq_8C&pg=PA264. Retrieved 11 June 2010. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 McLeod, John (2002). The history of India. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 209–. ISBN 9780313314599. http://books.google.com/books?id=DAwmUphO6eAC&pg=PA209. Retrieved 11 June 2010. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 Andersen, Walter K.; Shridhar D. Damle (1987). The Brotherhood in Saffron: The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu Revivalism. Boulder: Westview ress. p. 111. ISBN 0813373581. 
  7. Outlook, Feb 12, 2001
  8. http://www.rediff.com/news/2009/jul/25who-says-rss-is-a-dying-institution.htm
  9. RSS service projects multiply ten-fold, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/RSS-service-projectsmultiply-ten-fold/articleshow/5194113.cms
  10. 10.0 10.1 BBC NEWS | South Asia | Analysis: RSS aims for a Hindu nation
  11. Jaffrelot, Christophe (1998). The Hindu Nationalist Movement in India. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 35. ISBN 0-231-10334-4. 
  12. Dossani, Rafiq; Henry S. Rowen (2005). Prospects for peace in South Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press. p. 186. ISBN 0-8047-5085-8. 
  13. "Probe RSS links, says Congress". The Indian Express. May 18, 2010. http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Probe-RSS-links--says-Congress/620160. Retrieved 11 June 2010. 
  14. 14.0 14.1 Times of India, November 19, 2001
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 Gerald James Larson (1995). India's Agony Over Religion. State University of New York Press. pp. 132. ISBN 079142412X. 
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 Curran, Jean A. Jr. The RSS: Militant Hinduism Far Eastern Survey, Vol. 19, No. 10. (May 17, 1950), pp. 93–98.
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 Chitkara M G, Hindutva, Published by APH Publishing, 1997 ISBN 81-7024-798-5, 9788170247982
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 Chetan Bhatt, Hindu nationalism: origins, ideologies and modern myths, Published by Berg Publishers, 2001
  19. L. Joshi, Political Ideas and Leadership in Vidarbha, Nagpur University. Dept. of Political Science & Public Administration. Published by Silver Jubilee Committee, Dept. of Political Science & Public Administration, Nagpur University, 1980
  20. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/919613/Rashtriya-Swayamsevak-Sangh
  21. Gregory, Derek; Pred, Allan Richard (2007). Violent geographies: fear, terror, and political violence. CRC Press. pp. 158–159. ISBN 9780415951470. http://books.google.com/books?id=WALLf2Rh43oC&pg=PA158. Retrieved 14 June 2010. 
  22. Jaffrelot, Christophe (1998-08). The Hindu Nationalist Movement in India. Columbia University Press. pp. 55–. ISBN 9780231103350. http://books.google.com/books?id=Y2buDDwdgIsC&pg=PA55. Retrieved 17 June 2010. 
  23. #India
  24. Anthony Elenjimittam, Philosophy and action of the R. S. S for the Hind Swaraj, Published by Laxmi Publications, 1951, page 172
  25. Om Prakash Ralhan, Encyclopedia of political parties, Published by Anmol Publications PVT. LTD., 2002 ISBN 81-7488-865-9, page 224
  26. 26.0 26.1 http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/conflicts/india_pakistan/partition
  27. http://www.massviolence.org/India-from-1900-to-1947?artpage=3-5
  28. 28.0 28.1 Chandra, Ramesh (2003). Global Terrorism. Gyan Publishing House. pp. 105–. ISBN 9788178352404. http://books.google.com/books?id=D5UhM5Ov3oIC&pg=PA105. Retrieved 11 June 2010. 
  29. Rinehart, Robin (2004). Contemporary Hinduism: ritual, culture, and practice. ABC-CLIO. pp. 318–. ISBN 9781576079058. http://books.google.com/books?id=hMPYnfS_R90C&pg=PA318. Retrieved 11 June 2010. 
  30. 30.0 30.1 Report of Commission of Inquiry into Conspiracy to Murder Mahatma Gandhi, By India (Republic). Commission of Inquiry into Conspiracy to Murder Mahatma Gandhi, Jeevan Lal Kapur, Published by Ministry of Home affairs, 1970
  31. 31.0 31.1 http://books.google.com/books?id=sI_I-jk8YWsC&pg=PA279 | By Jawaharlal Nehru
  32. http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2701/stories/20100115270105200.htm | The Hindu
  33. The Statesman, January 15, 2000
  34. The Statesman, March 3, 2002
  35. Purushottam Shripad Lele, Dadra and Nagar Haveli: past and present, Published by Usha P. Lele,1987
  36. 36.0 36.1 Purushottam Shripad Lele, Dadra and Nagar Haveli: past and present, Published by Usha P. Lele, 1987
  37. Christophe Jaffrelot, The Hindu Nationalist Movement in India, Published by Columbia University Press, 1998
  38. Koenraad Elst, Decolonizing the Hindu Mind, Rupa Co, 2001
  39. M. G. Chitkara, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh: National Upsurge, Page 275
  40. Srirupa Roy, Beyond belief: India and the Politics of Postcolonial Nationalism, Page 83
  41. Christophe Jaffrelot, Hindu nationalism: a reader, Published by Princeton University Press, 2007
  42. Pralay Kanungo, RSS's tryst with politics: from Hedgewar to Sudarshan, p. 58. Published by Manohar Publishers and Distributors, 2002
  43. Koenraad Elst, Decolonizing the Hindu mind: ideological development of Hindu revivalism, Published by Rupa & Co., 2001
  44. Jaffrelot Christophe, Hindu nationalist movement and the Indian politics, page 243
  45. 45.0 45.1 Emma Tarlo, Unsettling Memories: Narratives of India's "emergency", Published by Orient Blackswan, 2003, ISBN 81-7824-066-1, 9788178240664
  46. Martha Craven Nussbaum, The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future, Published by Harvard University Press, 2007 ISBN 0-674-02482-6, 9780674024823
  47. Jaffrelot Christophe, Hindu Nationalism, 1987, 297, Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-13098-1, ISBN 978-0-691-13098-9
  48. Post Independence India, Encyclopedia of Political Parties, 2002, published by Anmol Publications PVT. LTD, ISBN 81-7488-865-9, 9788174888655
  49. page 238, Encyclopedia of Political parties, Volumes 33–50 http://books.google.co.in/books?id=QCh_yd357iIC&pg=PA238
  50. Suresh Ramabhai, Vinoba and his mission, Published by Akhil Bharat Sarv Seva Sangh, 1954
  51. 51.0 51.1 51.2 51.3 M S Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Publishers: Sahitya Sindhu Prakashana
  52. RSS might get trendy uniform next year Rediff – July 23, 2004
  53. 53.0 53.1 53.2 KAUSHIK, NARENDRA (June 5, 2010). "RSS shakhas fight for survival - India - The Times of India". Indiatimes (The Times of India). http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/RSS-shakhas-fight-for-survival/articleshow/6015003.cms. Retrieved 11 June 2010. 
  54. 54.0 54.1 K. R. Malkani, The RSS story, Published by Impex India, 1980
  55. M. G. Chitkara, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh: national upsurge, Published by APH Publishing, 2004, ISBN 81-7648-465-2, 9788176484657
  56. Sangh's e-Sevaks http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/nation/sangh-s-e-sevaks
  57. 57.0 57.1 H. V. Seshadri, Hindu renaissance under way, Published in 1984, Jagarana Prakashana, Distributors, Rashtrotthana Sahitya (Bangalore)
  58. Jaffrelot, Christophe. Hindu Nationalism: a Reader. 
  59. Bhatt, p. 114.
  60. RSS unhappy with infighting in Guj BJP ~ Ahmedabad News| Info| History| Guide about Ahmedabad, Gujarat India
  61. Toe swadeshi line or lose support, RSS warns BJP
  62. I will always be a swayamsevak: PM
  63. Shekhawat a non-partisan candidate, says Vajpayee
  64. Haniffa, Aziz, Agnihotri's appointment aimed at boosting US ties, India Abroad, 08-31-2001
  65. RSS for Dalit head priests in temples,Times of India
  66. RSS rips into ban on Dalits entering temples Times of India – January 9, 2007
  67. Jaffrelot Christophe, The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics: 1925 to the 1990s, 1996, 45, C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd, ISBN 1-85065-170-1, ISBN 978-1-85065-170-3
  68. Jaffrelot, p. 50.
  69. K S Bharati, Encyclopedia of Eminent Thinkers, Volume 7, 1998
  70. Om Prakash Ralhan, Encyclopedia of Political Parties,1998
  71. M. G. Chitkara, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh" national upsurge, 2004
  72. Goa rebuilds quake-hit Gujarat village Times of India – June 19, 2002
  73. 73.0 73.1 Ensuring transparency The Hindu – February 18, 2001
  74. Jammu kids get home away from guns, IBN live, Wed, Jun 28, 2006
  75. JK: RSS adopts militancy hit Muslim children, Sunday, June 25, 2006
  76. Fund of Controversy Times of India – December 14, 2002
  77. Relief missions from Delhi, The Hindu
  78. Tsunami toll in TN, Pondy touches 7,000 Rediff – December 29, 2004
  79. RSS joins relief operation in flood-hit Surat,Organiser.org
  80. http://www.expressbuzz.com/edition/story.aspx?Title=RSS+volunteers+fan+out+to+do+relief+work&artid=sqA5DxtEE5w=&SectionID=e7uPP4|pSiw=&MainSectionID=fyV9T2jIa4A=&SectionName=EH8HilNJ2uYAot5nzqumeA==&SEO= The New Indian Express:RSS volunteers fan out to do relief work
  81. 81.0 81.1 Kushwant Singh: “Congress (I) is the Most Communal Party”, Publik Asia, 16-11-1989. quoted in Elst Koenraad, Who is a Hindu?, chapter 8.1
  82. 82.0 82.1 High Courts on RSS, Sahitya Sindhu publishers, 1983, ISBN818659518X
  83. 83.0 83.1 Supreme Court of India. Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs Ramshanker Raghuvanshi, case no 4679, 1980, High Courts on RSS, Sahitya Sindhu publishers, 1983, ISBN818659518X
  84. 84.0 84.1 The Supreme Court Millennium Digest, V. R. Manohar, Chitaley W. W., 2000 Published by All India Reporter, 2000, Published by All India Reporter, page 842
  85. 85.0 85.1 A. G. Noorani, Political past of Public Servants, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 18, No. 29 (Jul. 16, 1983), p. 1265
  86. 86.0 86.1 Indian Factories & Labour Reports, By India Supreme Court, Published by Law Publishing House, 1988,Item notes: v. 57, page 27
  87. 87.0 87.1 Labour Law Journal, By India Courts, India Supreme Court, Published by R. Krishnaswami, 1983, page 301
  88. 88.0 88.1 R. Venkataramani, Judgements by O. Chinnappa Reddy, a Humanist, 1989, page 8
  89. Noorani, A.G. (2000). The RSS and the BJP: A Division of Labor. New Delhi. 
  90. Damle, Shridhar D (1987). The Brotherhood in Saffron. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu Revivalism. New Delhi: Vistaar Publications. p. 56. 
  91. http://books.google.co.in/books?id=QCh_yd357iIC&pg=PA229&lpg=PA229&dq=zakir+hussain+on+sangh&source=bl&ots=C-uIxwQO69&sig=-0aCNkUnVtr3U3hqk2fW0Xk7acI&hl=en&ei=MpmSSruSEdL-kAXvx-DCAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10#v=onepage&q=&f=false
  92. http://www.rediff.com/news/mar/28varsha.htm
  93. Jaffrelot, Christophe (1987). Hindu Nationalism. Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-13098-1, 9780691130989. p. 297. 
  94. http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/mar/11franc.htm
  95. http://www.blogs.ivarta.com/Defaming-Hinduism/blog-4.htm
  96. 96.0 96.1 96.2 96.3 96.4 Blakely, Rhys (November 20, 2008). "Hindu extremists reward to kill Christians as Britain refuses to bar members". The Times (London). http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article5186703.ece. Retrieved May 22, 2010. 
  97. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1993/08/09/world/india-bomb-kills-10-in-offices-of-group-of-militant-hindus.html?pagewanted=1. 
  98. Brass, Paul R. (2003). The Production of Hindu-Muslim Violence in Contemporary India. Seattle: University of Washington Press. p. 6. ISBN 0-295-98506-2. 
  99. 99.0 99.1 Jaffrelot, p. 51.
  100. Jaffrelot, p. 57-58.
  101. Hindu Nationalist Politics The Hindu – September 24, 2005
  102. Elst Koenraad, Saffron Swastika, Voice of India publication
  103. http://www.hindustantimes.com/rssfeed/india/Excerpts-from-the-Liberhan-Commission-report/Article1-479907.aspx
  104. http://www.indianexpress.com/news/how-the-bjp-rss-mobilised-kar-sevaks/545911/
  105. http://news.rediff.com/report/2009/nov/24/liberhan-comes-down-heavily-on-advani-and-vajpayee.htm
  106. http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_vajpayee-advani-severely-indicted-by-liberhan-commission_1315927
  107. http://indiatoday.intoday.in/site/Story/72219/India/Sudarshan+contests+Liberhan%27s+claim.html
  108. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata-/New-Article/articleshow/5265781.cms
  109. 109.0 109.1 old dead link to report Liberhan Takes Suspicions As Proof – The New Indian Express, Bengalooru Edition 07-Dec-2009
  110. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Kalyan-govt-executed-demolition-plan-Liberhan-Commission/articleshow/5265687.cms
  111. http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/liberhan_report_a_fraud_says_bjps_arun_jaitly.php
  112. http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2010/01/01/kashmiri-hindus-exodus-led-babri-demolition%E2%80%A6
  113. http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2002/04/29/india-gujarat-officials-took-part-anti-muslim-violence
  114. RSS, VHP appeal for peace in Gujarat http://www.rediff.com/news/2002/mar/02train10.htm
  115. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSDEL352926
  116. http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/southasia/features/article_1434632.php/Radical_Hindus_attack_Christians_over_&quotforced_conversions&quot__News_Feature__ – Deutsche Presse-Agentur
  117. 117.0 117.1 http://www.dailypioneer.com/61677/RSS-wing-blames-Cong-MP-for-triggering-communal-tension-in-Kandhamal.html
  118. http://www.indianexpress.com/news/slain-vhp-man-was-conversion-king/353136/
  119. The Hindu book page 19
  120. Communal Riots in Post-Independence India-Sangam Books 1984, 1991, 1997-Asgar ali engineer
  121. Gupta, N.L. (2000). Communal riots in India. New Delhi: Gyan Pub. House. p. 20. ISBN 8121206448. 
  122. The RSS and The BJP:A division of labour-by A.G Noorani
  123. "Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh" By D. R. Goyal (University of Michigan) pg 231
  124. http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P3-1285298261.html – Hindustan Times – June 9, 2007
  125. http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/india/news/article_1315394.php/Constitution_is_root_cause_of_country_s_ills_RSS_chief – IANS

Bibliography

Publications

Books

See also

External links